Probate Code Section 850 allows a procedure for litigants to seek the transfer of property into or out of a trust or estate.  It is an often-used vehicle in Trust and Estate litigation, but not often understood.

In its simplest form, a typical “850 Petition” is used to transfer real property into a revocable trust after the death of the trust creator (called the “Settlor”) where title to such property was not properly titled in the name of the trust before death.  All too often, people create trusts without understanding that a trust only controls assets that are transferred into it.  Thus, after death, the trust may be created, but it may not control all of the decedent’s assets.  To cure this defect, the successor trustee of the trust can file an 850 Petition requesting that the decedent’s property be transferred to the trust and be held as a trust asset.

The basis for transferring property into a trust after death is set forth in an often-cited case called Estate of Heggstad.  In Heggstad, an individual created a trust, but failed to transfer title to his real property into the trust prior to his death.  However, in the trust instrument he stated (i.e., he declared) that he held the same real property as trustee.  The Heggstad Court held that where an owner of property declares himself to be trustee of that property, the property is a trust asset and can be formally transferred to the trust after death.

Therefore, nearly every 850 Petition that asks for property to be transferred into a trust uses Estate of Heggstad as its legal basis.  But Estate of Heggstad has its limitation.  Oftentimes it is cited for positions that were never discussed or even contemplated by that case.  For example, a proper “Heggstad Petition” requires that the owner of property declares himself or herself to be holding that same property as trustee.  Typically, this requires some reference to the subject property either in the trust document (such as on a schedule to the trust) or in a separate written assignment.  If there is no such declaration, there is no Heggstad application.  Yet time and again petitioners allege that certain property should transfer to the trust because the decedent intended to put it into the trust but never got around to doing it.  This is not enough.  Either the decedent declared himself as trustee or he didn’t.

Courts in this area are beginning to see this Heggstad issue more strictly—actually requiring some showing that the Heggstad requirements are met.  In the past, it was not uncommon to have a particular piece of property transferred into a trust (and thereby avoid the probate process) even though the Heggstad elements were not fully met.  A sort of “wink and a nod” approach that many Courts accepted in order to streamline the process.  Not so now.  At least some of the elements of Heggstad must be demonstrated in most Courts if you are looking to “Heggstad” a piece of property.  This is especially true where the petition is contested—multiple beneficiaries arguing over whether property should transfer into trust or not.

But wait there’s more.  This is going to take a few posts to fully digest.  For purposes of this post remember that a declaration of owning property as trustee may be sufficient to make a personal asset a trust asset.  This is assuming someone messed up and failed to transfer the asset into trust before death.

  • tim

    my mother and father had formed an abc trust in 1988. My father died in 2003. The same year my mother took out a second mortgage and the mortgage company took the deed out of the trust. The next year my mother amended the trust to change successor trustees, she did not put the house back in the trust. At the time she was 80 years old. My mother died last month.

    Can 850 petition put the house back in the trust. The house would be the major value in the trust

  • The answer is maybe, depends on whether that asset is listed on a schedule to the Trust or listed on a related general assignment.

  • Bill Fishman

    These cases generally have NOT been contested. Even in crabby families, nobody wants to deal with Probate.

  • Thanks for the great input. Some Court, like in Riverside County, are starting to crack down on using Heggstad even in uncontested cases. But using Heggstad as much as you can is a great idea.