To Probate or Not to Probate: When must a decedent's assets pass through Court?

When do you need to probate the assets of a decedent?  First of all, let's make sure we know what "probate" means--it sounds like a medical condition.  But in fact it is simply a court process where a decedent's assets are taken over by an appointed "personal representative", the last debts and bills of the decedent are paid, and then the assets are eventually distributed to the heirs (if there is no Will) or to the named beneficiaries under the Will. 

Probate only applies to assets that are owned, or titled, in the indiviudal name of the decedent at the time of his or her death.  Probate does NOT apply to things like joint tenancy with right or survivorship, beneficiary designations, pay-on-death accounts or transfer-on-death account, or any assets held in a Trust.  And since a majority of assets are held in one or more of these types of ownership, it can be rare when a probate is actually required.

Further, in California you can pass up to $150,000 of property (not including real estate) without having to open probate.  Instead, you can use an affidavit of small estate, sometimes referred to as a "13100 Declaration" (see a sample 13100 Declaration).  The "13100" refers to Probate Code Section 13100, which governs the transfer of small estates.  For real property, the limit is $50,000 that can pass without probate.  That is a very small number for California real estate (even after the market crash), so real property almost always must be probated if it is held in an individual's name (and not in joint tenancy) at time of death.

By the way, we often are asked what are "Letters Testamentary" or "Letters of Administration."  Oftentimes, when a family member tries to wrap up a decedent's assets, they are told by a bank or financial institution that they need "Letters Testamentary" or "Letters of Administration."  Those are not letters drafted by lawyers, they're not letters at all in the modern usage of that term.  Rather, they are documents issued by the Court AFTER a probate has been opened and the Court has signed the order appointing the personal representative (the term "personal representative" is a catchall phrase that includes both Executors (who are named under Wills) and Administrators (that same thing as an Exeuctor except for estates where there is NO Will)).

The Answer: where a decedent dies owning assets in his or her own, individual name worth more than $150,000 (not included real estate), then you need to open probate to transfer the decedent's assets to the heirs or beneficiaries under the Will.  If the decedent owned real property worth more than $50,000 in his or her own name, then off to probate you must go.

You can see a few of our aticles about the probate process here

Self-Guided Tour Through the California Probate Process: Can you handle a probate on your own?

The probate process is probably one of the most archaic procedures we still have in our legal system.  Probate simply means to prove-up a Will—it’s the process where a Will is determined to be valid by the Court, it is then “admitted” to probate (as we say), an Executor is appointed and the administration of the decedent’s assets begins.

Probate also applies where there is no Will, then the Court determines that no valid Will exists, an Administrator is appointed, and the administration of the decedent’s assets begins.

Sounds pretty straightforward, until you run face-first into the procedural wall of probate.  There have been many times when I have been asked by non-lawyers “can I do the probate myself?”  My response is: yes.  This is America, anyone can represent themselves in Court—for the most part.  There are a few exceptions to that rule, but a simple, uncontested probate can be handled by the Executor.  All you need to do is know all the rules, procedures, and arcane terms of probate…well maybe its not so simple after all.

In fact, there are plenty of lawyers who have a hard time navigating the probate process.  The rules that have been established over many centuries (yes, some of our probate laws/rules are that old) are not intuitive to understand.  And if you don’t comply with the process, then your probate dies a slow death in Probate Court.

But still, it’s not impossible.  It just takes a good amount of homework and an extra large dose of patience.  And every probate can be broken down in three main parts (1) Starting the probate process, (2) administering the estate, and (3) closing the estate.

1.         Starting probate.  To start a California probate you have to file a petition with the Court.  A petition is just a way of asking the Court to do something—in this case it’s to open a probate.  There are other forms that go along with the petition too.  Once you prepare the petition, you file it with the Court and the Court will give you an initial hearing date for sometime in the future.  Once you have that date, you have to serve Notice of Hearing on all persons named in the Will AND all heirs at law.  You also have to publish notice of the probate in the newspaper before the hearing date. 

If all goes well and your papers are in order, then the Court will grant the petition, sign the Order opening probate, and issue Letters (either Letters Testamentary for an estate with a Will, or Letter of Administration for intestate estates (that’s estate’s with no Will)). 

See my video on how to prepare a Petition for Probate.  We also have a post with links to all necessary (well most necessary anyway) probate forms.   

2.         Administering the estate.  Once the California probate estate is opened all estate assets must be gathered and inventoried and appraised.  All cash can be appraised by the Executor, but any other assets, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. must be appraised by the Court appointed probate referee.

Creditor’s of the decedent must be noticed, property sold or positioned for distribution, and any estate bills paid.  If someone claims to be a creditor, but the Executor believes the claim to be invalid, then there may be a lawsuit to determine which claims are appropriate to be paid.

Once all creditor’s are paid and assets are either sold or positioned for distribution, its time to close the estate.

3.         Closing the estate.  The final petition that must be filed in a California probate is a report by the Personal Representative, which usually includes an accounting of the estate assets and a request to distribute the estate assets to the appropriate heirs.

The estate accounting is the trickiest part of this equation because it must be prepared in a manner that complies with Probate Code Section 1060 et seq.  And an estate accounting is unlike any other type of accounting.  So you have to find someone who knows how to properly prepare this type of accounting.

The final petition also asks for compensation to be paid to the Executor and the estate’s attorney.  Both the Executor and the attorney are entitled to the same fee, which is a sliding scale percentage of the estate’s value.  The fee equals:

4% of the first $100,000 of value               $4,000

3% of the next $100,000 of value              $3,000

2% of the next $800,000 of value              $16,000

1% of all amounts up to $5 million             $50,000

Most probate estates are not $5 million in value.  However, a typical estate worth $500,000 would result in a fee to the Executor of $13,000.  The estate’s attorney would receive the same amount, $13,000.

Navigating your way through the California probate process is not impossible, its just time-consuming and, at times, frustrating.  But take a deep breath and see what you can do.  If all else fails, you can always hire an attorney to take the probate to the finish line.

Will and Trust Creation: The basic requirements of California Trust and Will creation

Keith A. Davidson describes in this video the basic requirements for creating a California Will and Trust. He refers to the basic creation elements as "formalities" and "intentionalities", terms he uses in teaching California Will and Trust creation at Chapman Law School (which he borrowed from his own Trust and Will professor, Father O'brien (thank you Father O'Brien!), who taught at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles).  For those viewing this blog by email subscription, you can click on the title for a link to the video. 

Coping with Incapacity: How Trust Planning Is Life Planning

How does your trust help you while you’re alive?  Many people think of trusts as death planning instruments--the type of thing that only operates upon your death.

But trusts have a critically important role to play while you are alive in the event you lose capacity.  People are living longer and the likelihood of being physically able, but mentally unfit is growing.

Without a trust plan in place, a person and his money cannot be easily cared for. In fact, a court supervised conservatorship is required to manage the person and estate of people who lose mental capacity, but have no other safeguards in place for the management of their money and personal care. 

Unfortunately, conservatorships are costly, time consuming and expose everything (and I mean everything) to ongoing court supervision.  In other words, your life becomes an open book and the court decides who will make decisions for you and then tries to oversee those decisions as best it can....yikes!

Since a conservatorship takes place in court, it provides a ready forum for lawsuits.  It's not uncommon for a person's children to fight over who should be named as the conservator.  And those types of lawsuits can be nasty business.

But a well planned trust can avoid all of that because under the trust terms, you appoint a successor to manage your money if you ever become incapacitated.  You should also have a Health Care Directive in place so that you can name someone to make your medical decisions.  With these two documents properly prepared, your personal care and your assets can be quietly and easily managed until you return to full mental capacity.

So the next time someone tells you that a trust isn't necessary because it only takes effect after you're dead and gone, think again.  That trust may save you a lot of time, money and public scrutiny while you’re still alive.

Simple Will = Simple Meal: How doing good can taste good too.

Back in March we offered to provide simple Wills to members of our community at no cost (you know, for free).  We decided to limit the program to 20 people per month to ensure that we were not overwhelmed by requests for free simple Wills.  And the response to our free Will program was overwhelming.  By “overwhelming” I mean only 3 people applied for the program.  Not three per month, just three overall.  I guess no one believes lawyers would do anything helpful for free.

We learned an interesting lesson.  People don’t trust free.  In fact, each of the three people who applied for a free simple Will asked the same question “why are you doing this?”  The truth is that we wanted to provide a service to our community.  Simple Wills are relatively easy for us to prepare and we can’t charge all that much for them to begin with, so why not just give them away and build some good-will in the process.

Of the 3 people who took advantage of our free Will program, each of them were very grateful.  But none more so than Ms. Betty Jamison who decided that she wanted to provide us some form of payment in return.  So she and her husband, James, cooked up a batch of barbecue ribs and a homemade lemon pound-cake.  She brought the food to our office and we ate like Kings.  I never knew law practice could taste so good.

I never wanted or expected anything in return for our free simple Will program, but I truly appreciated the home cooking.  Not just because it tasted delicious, but also because these people spent their time making us food.  And with cooking like that, we may have just stumbled onto a new way to bill for our legal services.

Which Will Wins the Race? The Documents Required For a Proper Will Contest Lawsuit.

There is an old saying in the law that goes “first in time, first in right.”  For Wills, the opposite is true—last in time, last in right.  Typically the last valid Will wins.  But what if the last Will is not valid?  That could allow an earlier Will to apply instead.  And it is this dispute—last Will versus second-to-last Will—that is at the heart of nearly every Will contest lawsuit.

Of course, a Will cannot be overturned just because the heirs or beneficiaries don’t like the Will terms.  There has to be some legal basis to invalidate the Will (see our earlier blog post on invalidating a Will).  Once a legal basis is determined, it’s time to get down to business; actually filing the Will contest.

A Will contest lawsuit is unique in that it requires a few steps, and a few different filings, before the lawsuit is properly “before the Court” (which just means all the correct paperwork is filed so the Court can handle the matter).  Let’s walk through the steps for a properly filed Will contest lawsuit:

Step 1 – Petition for Probate: You have to open a probate estate.  In California, a Will is not is not a Will until it is admitted to probate.  The procedure of admitting a Will to probate is the Court’s method for proving that the Will is valid.  Before being admitted to probate, a Will is simply evidence of a potentially valid Will.  Once admitted to probate, a Will is, by law, a valid Will.

So whether you are trying to admit the last Will or an earlier Will, you must ask the Court to admit the Will to probate and that requires a Petition for Letters Testamentary (also referred to as a Petition for Probate).  Under the Petition for Probate, you recite the facts as they pertain to the Will you want admitted and then you must sign the Petition and file it with the Court. 

What if the opposing party has already filed their own Petition for Probate?  No problem, you file your own Petition for Probate as well (they are referred to as “competing petitions,” but you use the same form whether you’re filing first or second).  It makes no difference who files first, as long as you file before the opposing Will is admitted to probate.

Step 2—The Objection.  The next step is a separate filing called an objection to probate of Will as prescribed by Probate Code Section 8250. This is the actual Will contest filing where you explain why the other person’s Will is invalid and what legal basis (or bases) you are using to dislodge that Will.  A Will contest objection under Section 8250 is unique under the Probate Code in that it is the only probate filing that requires the issuance of a summons (like the ones used for civil complaints).  Both the objection and the summons must be personally served on everyone (and I mean everyone) mentioned in the Will you are trying to invalidate, along with all of the decedent’s heirs (if they are not otherwise mentioned in the contested Will). 

Step 3—Prove your case.  At trial, the proponent of the contested Will must first prove due execution of the Will (which means that it was properly executed as set forth under Section 6110).  Once execution is established, it is then the contestant’s burden to prove any of the legal grounds to invalidate the Will, including lack of capacity, undue influence, fraud, duress, or revocation.  Never forget what your burden is at trial because it will guide your actions in conducting discovery beforehand.

After taking the right steps, your Will contest is on its way through the Court system.  Now the work really begins….

California Petition for Probate How To--A quick walk through on the Petition for Probate

The Asset Puzzle - Why Your California Will May Not Matter.

The manner in which assets are titled govern how those assets pass at death.  And this can override a disposition contained in a Will or Trust. All the effort people take to prepare a Will or Trust can be wasted if assets are not titled properly.  This is what I call the asset puzzle.

The first part of the puzzle is knowing the possible pieces (i.e., the way in which assets can transfer at death).  There are differing ways in which assets pass at death and it can be downright confusing.

For exapmle, life insurance passes by beneficiary designation. Whoever is named as the beneficiary on the form in the files of the life insurance company takes at death. It does not matter what the decedent's Will or Trust state, the beneficiary designation controls. Therefore, even though a Will may be created that leaves assets equally to the decedent's children, if only one child is listed as a beneficiary of a life insurance policy, then that one child takes the life insurance proceeds and the other children get none.

Same applies to assets titled in joint tenancy. Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, real property and cars all have the ability to be held jointly with another person or persons. When one joint owner dies, the other joint owners receive the property automatically without the need for probate. But this also means that the assets pass without regard to a Will or Trust. All too often I see children unintentionally excluded because they are not included as a joint tenants on the assets.

For some reason people think that if they have a joint tenancy over their assets one of two things will occur. Either (1) the child who takes that asset will share with the other children (even though there is no legal obligation to do so), or (2) the Will or Trust will override the joint tenancy or beneficiary designation (which is false, the beneficiary or joint tenancy overrides the Will or Trust).

This is where planning comes into the picture. Planning is NOT the act of simply having a Will or Trust.  A Will or Trust is a required part of planning, but that is just the beginning. The most crucial part of planning is looking at all the assets in the estate and changing title to those assets to conform to the plan.  This means filing a new deed so the house is in the Trust, for example.  Changing the title on bank or brokerage accounts, ensuring any beneficiary designations go to either the Trust or the proper individuals.  In other words, looking at the entire, big picture and taking all necessary action.  That’s truly the definition of planning.

By the way, it's lack of planning that keeps lawyers fully employed because that is when litigation and probate ensue. And we lawyers make far more money on probate and litigation then we do on planning. So while people look at me skeptically when I plead with them to have an estate plan, I really should be pleading NOT to create a plan. So support your local lawyers, neglect your planning!

California Will Substitutes--A Private System of Succession

Fifty years ago, most assets passed from an individual who died to his or her family by way of Probate (by Will or Intestacy both of which require Probate). Probate is a strict, expensive and time-consuming Court process that must be completed before assets can ultimately being transferred to family members.

But today, we own assets differently than we did fifty years ago. Most of us have bank accounts, retirement accounts, life insurance, and perhaps Living Trusts. These four types of assets (or financial vehicles) constitute the core of the so-called “Nonprobate Transfers” or “Will Substitutes”, meaning each of these assets pass outside Probate if properly designated.

California law expressly allows these Nonprobate Transfer assets to pass outside the probate process, even though these assets do not comply with the formal requirements for execution of a Will (read more about the Formalities and Intentionalities of Will creation.) Accordingly, individuals can rely on beneficiary designation forms that identify who gets his or her bank accounts, life insurance, and retirement accounts at his or her death without regard to what a Will states. As a result, with proper planning, an individual’s entire estate can pass at death to his or her family members outside of the Probate system. In fact, this is one of the primary reasons why estate planners created Revocable Trust—to avoid Probate altogether.

Let’s take an example, Stewart owns the following assets:

  • a home worth $400,000;
  • a rental property worth $350,000;
  • two bank accounts totaling $60,000;
  • a retirement account totaling $500,000; and
  • life insurance with a death benefit of $1 million.

Stewart’s total estate is worth $2,310,000. If Stewart’s estate passes by a Will or Intestacy, it must go through the Probate system. The attorney’s fees on this size of an estate would result in fees of approximately $40,000 (read more on how Probate fees are calculated.)

On the other hand, Stewart’s entire estate could pass by way of Nonprobate Transfers (also known as Will Substitutes), as follows:

  • Stewart’s (i) home and (ii) rental property are owned by his Living Trust, which designates the beneficiaries of his home and rental property.
  • Stewart’s (i) bank accounts, (ii) retirement account, and (iii) life insurance have “beneficiary designation” cards filled out designating who gets these assets on Stewart’s death.

Now Stewart’s entire estate passes outside of the Probate Court process.

Ultimately, these types of Nonprobate Transfers (or Will Substitutes) function as a private system of transferring assets at death—usually requiring less time, fewer rules, and a lower cost than Probate requires.

Starting the California Probate Process

In an earlier post we described what probate is and that it only applies to assets titled in the name of the decedent at the time of her death.  Now we want to discuss how to start the probate process (it's just a court process after all).

Handling a California probate can be summed up in one word--procedure.  It is a procedural monster that requires strict compliance with the rules of probate.  Some of the rules are easy to find and others are not, but complying with the rules is the only way to successfully navigate a probate.

Probate starts with a “Petition for Probate”.  A Petition is just a document that starts the ball rolling by asking the court for relief.  Here, in California, the Petition for Probate (Form DE-111) is meant to ask the Court to accept the decedent's Will as being a good and valid Will and appoint an executor to act as the decedent's personal representative (if there is no Will then the personal representative is referred to as the Administrator rather than Executor). 

The good news is that the Petition for Probate is a form document. The bad news is that it's not as easy to prepare correctly as one might think when first looking it over. But it's not too difficult either once you understand the process a bit better.  The key to the initial petition is to read each section carefully and mark all sections that apply.

And you will need a few other forms as well: such as the Duties and Liability of the Personal Representative, Letters, Order, Notice of Petition to Administer Estate, and Confidential Supplement.  (See our prior post listing many probate forms.)  There may be a local form or two that each local court of a particular California county requires.  This varies by location and you should check with your local court for any filing instructions—or check the court’s website where they typically list local forms. 

DISCLAIMER: We are not intending to provide you with legal advice in this blog, we are only presenting general information relating to probate procedure.  Every case may vary based on the facts and circumstances of your particular case.  You should always discuss your case with a California lawyer before filing a probate in California.

California Probate--the Procedural Pickle of Passing Assets at Death

Probate is an antiquated term that simply means to prove-up a decedent’s Will.  It is a Court process where a decedent’s assets are gathered, creditors are paid, heirs are identified and located, and the assets distributed either according to the decedent's Will or by statute if a decedent died without a Will (referred to as “intestate” distribution).

The probate process is centuries old and requires compliance with a strict set of procedural rules in order to start the process, administer the process and, ultimately, close the process successfully  (see our list of California Probate Forms).  The irony is that there are so few, if any, procedural hurdles for assets that pass outside the probate process.

For instance, in California, probate only applies to assets titled in the name of the decedent alone at the time of her death.  Many assets pass outside of probate (we refer to these as "non-probate assets"), such as assets that are held in joint tenancy (with right of survivorship), assets passing by beneficiary designations (such as life insurance and bank accounts) and of course assets held in a Trust.

The problem arises when an asset held in joint tenancy, for example, passes differently from the assets passing under a decedent's California Will.  The Will may say all assets pass equally to the decedent's children, but if an asset is held in joint tenancy with just one child, then that one child takes the asset regardless of the Will.  In other words, the Will does not control, or in any way affect, assets passing outside of probate.  This is an important point and may be surprising news for some people.

Another common misconception is that if someone dies without a California Will or Trust their assets pass to the State of California.  Not true.  Under California law, there is a scheme set up by State law that provides for the distribution of a decedent's assets to their heirs at law if they die without a will.  Heirs at law include the decedent's spouse, children, parents, brothers and sisters and even nieces and nephews, at times.

If you find that a decedent has died and there are assets subject to probate, either under a Will or without a Will, then it’s time to start the probate process.  That's the subject of another blog post.

The Intentionalities and Formalities of California Will Creation

When creating a California Will there are a few basic steps that must be met from a legal perspective in order for that Will to be legally valid.  In their simplest form, the two areas required for a valid California Will are the necessary “Intentionalities” and the required “Formalities.”

Intentionalities:

Intentionalities  evidence a person’s intent to create a Will.  Will creation requires intent—the person creating the Will (referred to as the “Testator” ) must intend to make a Will.  And there are a number of things that can undermine the necessary intent to make a valid Will.  A short list of such items include: lack of mental capacity, undue influence, fraud, and duress and menace.  The full list of intentionalitiesfollows:

       Intentionalities:

  • Intent to create a will
  • Capacity
  • Undue influence
  • Fraud
  • Duress and menace.

Formalities:

Formalities refer to the formal requirements for California Will creation.  For example, a Will must be in writing (no oral Wills are allowed), signed by the testator, and witnessed by two disinterested witnesses.  Alternatively, a hand-written Will can be valid if the material provisions are written in the testator’s own handwriting and signed—no witnesses needed (this is referred to as a “Holographic” Will).

       Formalities:

  • Written Will
  • Signed by testator
  • Witnessed by two disinterested witnesses or holographic.

Using these two areas of legal requirements, you can go down the list of Intentionalities and Formalities to determine if a Will is valid or not.  The lack of any one item may result in an invalid Will.  For example, a Will with all the necessary Intentionalities, that is printed from a computer and signed by the testator could still be invalid if it lacks the required two witnesses.  Conversely, a properly executed and witnessed Will could be invalid if the testator lacks mental capacity or if the testator is unduly influenced in making the Will. 

Does that mean Wills are easy to attack?  Not necessarily.  In fact, a vast majority of Will contests that make it to trial fail to succeed.  Of course, this could be due in part to the fact that many of the cases with troubling facts settle before trial.

Keep this list of Intentionalities and Formalities in mind as we submit further blog posts on the component areas—such as undue influence, capacity, fraud, etc.

The Practical Considerations for Including a No Contest Clause in a Trust or Will

In an earlier post we discussed the terrorizing effects of no contest clauses. For all the uncertainty the new no contest law has created—and the very real possibility that such clauses are rarely enforceable—many decedent’s doom the effectiveness of their own no contest clause themselves when including a no contest clause in their will or trust. This is because many decedents fail to provide a meaningful threat of disinheritance under the trust or will.

For example, let’s say that I am a trust beneficiary and the trust has total assets worth $4,000,000. The trust is created by my father and provides for an equal distribution of assets between my brother and me—a 50/50 split. Shortly before my father’s death, he changes the trust terms leaving me a specific gift of $10,000 and leaving the rest to my brother. The newly revised trust has a no contest clause that states that I am disinherited (i.e., I lose my $10,000 gift) if I challenge the trust terms. But if I challenge the trust terms and win, I stand to receive half of $4 million, or $2,000,000. Will I risk losing $10,000 to contest the trust and hopefully receive $2 million? Most likely, yes. In this scenario I have no reason not to contest the trust. Thus, from a practical perspective, the trust’s no contest clause has failed to prevent a contest. The gift is too small and the threat of disinheritance too irrelevant when compared to the overall trust value.

So how big must a gift be to prevent a contest? That’s a relative question of course, but it should be big enough to cause a beneficiary to stop and think. In the example above, a specific gift of $500,000 certainly could have changed the decision. A gift of $1 million probably would have prevented a contest.

The overall value of a particular trust may be smaller than $4,000,000, but the analysis is the same—what amount is enough to prevent a contest. Giving a potential contestant nothing under the will or trust will definitely invite a contest because that person will have nothing to lose. Yet all too often that is exactly what occurs—a zero gift is a certain contest. But a gift of substance when compared to the overall value of the trust or estate is a different story. So give it some thought a try to plan with a realistic number so that the no contest clause has some practical effect behind it.